Kleiman v. Wright

Plaintiff: Ira Kleiman
Defendant: Craig Wright
Case Number: 9:2018cv80176
Filed: February 14, 2018
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Office: West Palm Beach Office
County: Palm Beach (Office: West Palm Beach)
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order 68 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Counts III and IV are dismissed with prejudice. Defendant shall file his answer as to Counts I, II and V-IX, on or before January 10, 2019. (Answer Deadline 1/10/2019.) Signed by Judge Beth Bloom. See attached document for full details. (ak03)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kleiman v. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ira Kleiman
Represented By: Devin Freedman
Represented By: Kyle Roche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Wright
Represented By: Andres Rivero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?