Melnicoff v. Granicus, Inc.
Plaintiff: John Melnicoff
Defendant: Granicus, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2018cv81415
Filed: October 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT as to #8 Transmittal Letter Sent (pes)
November 14, 2018 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT as to #7 Order Remanding Case to State Court, #8 Transmittal Letter Sent (drz)
October 31, 2018 Filing 8 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand to: 15th Judicial Circut Court for Palm Beach County. State Court Case Number: 502018CA011754 (pes)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Remanding Case to State Court. Closing Case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/31/2018. See attached document for full details. (pes)
October 31, 2018 Filing 6 STIPULATION re #3 Order to Show Cause Withdrawing Petition for Removal and Agreeing to Remand of the Case to State Court by Granicus, Inc. (Garrard, Amy)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Requiring Counsel to Meet, File Joint Scheduling Report and Joint Discovery Report. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/26/2018. See attached document for full details. (pes)
October 25, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Granicus, Inc.. (Garrard, Amy)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 10/31/2018. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/24/2018. See attached document for full details. (pes)
October 18, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
October 18, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Melnicoff v. Granicus, Inc.) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11088194, filed by Granicus, Inc. no answer/motion to dismiss filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint and Pleadings Filed In State Court Action, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Carrie Cisek)(Garrard, Amy) Modified on 10/19/2018 (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melnicoff v. Granicus, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Melnicoff
Represented By: Chad Evan Levy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Granicus, Inc.
Represented By: Amy Garrard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?