Peden v. State of Florida
| Jonathan Peden |
| State of Florida |
| 9:2019cv80381 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Lisette M Reid |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FIRST Clerk's Notice of Undeliverable Mail re #4 Order of Instructions to Pro Se Litigant. US Mail returned for: Jonathan Peden. The Court has not located an updated address for this party. After two undeliverable notices from the Court, notices will no longer be sent to this party in this case until a correct address is provided. (pgz) |
Filing 6
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, WITHDRAWING REFERENCE. Order Withdrawing Reference to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid Pedens Motion to Suppress [DE-1] is Dismissed. The Clerk shall close this case and deny any pending motions as Moot. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 3/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
|
Filing 5
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DISMISSING MOTION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY in favor of State of Florida against Jonathan Peden. On consideration of a Certificate of Appealability, the Court will deny such Certificate as this Court determines that Petitioner has not shown a violation of a substantial constitutional right.The Clerk shall close this case and deny any pending motions as Moot. Motions terminated: Denying as moot #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jonathan Peden. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 3/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 3/21/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Peden. (Attachments: #1 Resident Account Statement)(drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (drz) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Jonathan Peden.(drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Peden v. State of Florida | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Florida | |
| Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan Peden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
