Lodge v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Plaintiff: Robert Lodge
Defendant: Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2019cv80672
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Referring Judge: William J Zloch
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. Closing Case. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Zloch on 6/24/2019. See attached document for full details. (bc)
June 18, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Robert Lodge (Shamis, Andrew)
June 14, 2019 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Compel Defendant to Participate in Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. Replies due by 6/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order Denying Motion in the Mittelmark Case, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Jason Carrigan, #3 Exhibit C - Motion from the Mittelmark Case, #4 Exhibit D - E-Mail Correspondence Regarding Rule 26(f) Conference)(Kosches, Jordan)
June 11, 2019 Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to the First-Filed Doctrine filed by Robert Lodge. Replies due by 6/18/2019. (Hiraldo, Manuel)
June 10, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. re #5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions, Plaintiff's Failure to Oppose (Kosches, Jordan)
June 10, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Compel Defendant to Participate in Rule 26(f) Conference by Robert Lodge. Responses due by 6/24/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hiraldo, Manuel)
June 10, 2019 Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., filed by Robert Lodge.(Hiraldo, Manuel)
June 3, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Robert Lodge. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. served on 5/23/2019, answer due 6/13/2019. (Shamis, Andrew)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Mark S. Eisen is permitted to appear on behalf of Defendant. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Zloch on 6/3/2019. (bc)
May 31, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Mark S. Eisen. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11693068 by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. Responses due by 6/14/2019 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kosches, Jordan)
May 30, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to the First-Filed Doctrine by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. Responses due by 6/13/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Third Amended Class Action Complaint in Yates v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., #2 Exhibit B - Docket from Yates v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., #3 Exhibit C - Docket from Goldschmidt v. Rack Room Shoes, Inc.)(Kosches, Jordan)
May 24, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Class Action Complaint from case no.: 9:18-cv-81085-DMM, #2 Exhibit Docket from case no.: 9:18-cv-81085-DMM) (Kosches, Jordan)
May 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jordan Scott Kosches on behalf of Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. Attorney Jordan Scott Kosches added to party Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.(pty:dft). (Kosches, Jordan)
May 22, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. (kpe)
May 21, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge William J. Zloch and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe)
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11664703, filed by Robert Lodge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Shamis, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lodge v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc.
Represented By: Mark S. Eisen
Represented By: Jordan Scott Kosches
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lodge
Represented By: Andrew John Shamis
Represented By: Jordan David Utanski
Represented By: Garrett O. Berg
Represented By: Scott Adam Edelsberg
Represented By: Manuel Santiago Hiraldo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?