Shelly v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Susan Shelly
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 9:2019cv81231
Filed: September 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Bruce E Reinhart
Referring Judge: Robin L Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER expediting briefing on Plaintiff's #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Responses due by 9/10/2019. Replies due by 9/12/2019. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 9/5/2019. (kbs)
September 5, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Susan Shelly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Zbrzeznj, Lydia)
September 5, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lydia Sturgis Zbrzeznj on behalf of Susan Shelly. Attorney Lydia Sturgis Zbrzeznj added to party Susan Shelly(pty:pla). (Zbrzeznj, Lydia)
September 5, 2019 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE that attorney Howard W. Rubinstein has not been added to this case re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),,,. For further information, please contact Attorney Admissions at 305-523-5265. (cco)
September 5, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
September 5, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Susan Shelly v. Target Corporation) Filing fee $400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID 113C-11956002, payment transferred from : 9:19-cv-81227-Shelly v. Target Corporation, filed by Target Corporation. No Answer and/or Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint and other state court filings, #3 Declaration of John J. Rosenthal in support of notice of removal, #4 Exhibit A - Trends in glyphosate herbicide use, #5 Exhibit B - EPA Label Review Manual, #6 Exhibit C - EPA glyphosate issue paper, #7 Exhibit D - 1993 glyphosate RED, #8 Exhibit E - EPA Reg. No. 071995-00033, #9 Exhibit F - Fee petition in Moore, #10 Exhibit G - Fee petition in Hydroxycut, #11 Exhibit H - Fee petition in Fishbein, #12 Exhibit I - Fee petition in Weeks)(Calvar, Cristina) Modified on 9/5/2019 (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelly v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Shelly
Represented By: Lydia Sturgis Zbrzeznj
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Cristina Isabel Calvar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?