Grays Temple CME Church v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
| Grays Temple CME Church |
| Mt. Hawley Insurance Company |
| 9:2020cv80854 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFAULT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (as03)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On or before July 6, 2020, Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, why #4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss should not be granted by default and why Plaintiff failed to file a timely response. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 7/3/2020. See attached document for full details. (as03)
|
| Filing 5 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Mt. Hawley Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mahfood, Marcus) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM [DE 1-2] by Mt. Hawley Insurance Company. Responses due by 6/18/2020 (Mahfood, Marcus) |
| Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Nicole Sodano, mailing date 05/29/2020. (cco) |
| Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: Mt. Hawley Insurance Company response due 6/4/2020 per Rule 81 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (mhn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12949461, filed by Mt. Hawley Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Summon(s) Exhibit C - All Executed Process in State Court Case, #4 Exhibit A - Index of matters being filed, #5 Docket Sheet Exhibit D - State Court Case Docket Sheet, #6 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's Partial Estimate of Damages totaling $128127.90, #7 Exhibit F - List of all counsel of record and contact information)(Mahfood, Marcus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Grays Temple CME Church v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Grays Temple CME Church | |
| Represented By: | Nicole Sodano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mt. Hawley Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Marcus G. Mahfood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
