Cohan v. RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC
Howard Cohan |
RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC a Foreign Limited Liability Company doing business as Palm Beach Gardens Marriott |
9:2022cv80957 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC. (Paindiris, Tasos) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC identifying Corporate Parent RB-PHM Palm Beach Holdings 2017 LLC for RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC (DiNunzio, Ronald) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant seeks an unopposed 14-day extension of its July 22, 2022 deadline to respond to the Complaint. In support, Defendant represents that additional time is needed to inspect the properties at issue in this action and prepare a response. Additionally, the Parties intend to explore the possibility of an early resolution of this case. Motions for extensions of time must set forth good cause supported by specific facts. I find good cause to grant the requested extension, given the property inspections that need be conducted and the possibility of an early settlement, and in light of Plaintiff's lack of opposition. Accordingly, Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is August 5, 2022. The Parties are advised that the failure to reach a settlement will not constitute good cause for a further extension of this deadline. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 7/20/2022. (ifr) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ronald Charles DiNunzio, Jr on behalf of RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC. Attorney Ronald Charles DiNunzio, Jr added to party RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC(pty:dft). (DiNunzio, Ronald) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC. Attorney Tasos C. Paindiris added to party RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC(pty:dft). (Paindiris, Tasos) |
Filing 6 Statement of: Responding to the Court's Interrogatories by Howard Cohan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Photographs, #2 Exhibit Pacer Search)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC served on 7/1/2022, response/answer due 7/22/2022. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
Filing 4 ADA TITLE III SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 9/30/2022. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Mediation Deadline 9/23/2022. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 7/1/2022. See attached document for full details. (mee) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC. (swr) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (swr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RB-PHM Palm Beach 2017 LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15756149, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.