Khattar v. Droney
LEEROY KHATTAR |
SCOTT DRONEY and SCOTT HUNTER |
9:2024cv81361 |
October 30, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Bruce E Reinhart |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Scott Droney. (jas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) Scott Droney a/k/a Scott Hunter by LEEROY KHATTAR (Varbero, Anthony) |
Filing 6 First NOTICE Civil Cover Sheet by LEEROY KHATTAR re #1 Complaint, 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Varbero, Anthony) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Alias Not Added. The Filer failed to add the alias information for the party(ies). The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (drz) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Magistrate Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Filed by Leeroy Khattar against SCOTT DRONEY. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number BFLSDC-17948296, filed by LEEROY KHATTAR.(Varbero, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.