Postell v. Humphrey
Case Number: 1:2005cv00096
Filed: October 2, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Hodge
Presiding Judge: W. Louis Sands
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 73 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's Objection 74 is overruled. The Court dismisses with prejudice Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 10/2/2013. (bcl)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying 60 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 64 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 2/22/2011 (bcl)
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 50 Report and Recommendations. Case is ORDERED to proceed. Petitioner's objection at doc. 51 is OVERRULED.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 4/5/2010 (bcl)
February 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Timothy Postell. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2009. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Richard L. Hodge on 02/24/2009. (asb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Postell v. Humphrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?