MORRIS v. MORALES et al
ISAAC MORRIS |
JOSE MORALES, MARTY ALLEN, CEDRIC TAYLOR, CALEB AJIBADE, Aikens, K SWAGLER and ANGELA MCCRAW |
1:2013cv00021 |
February 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Albany Office |
Mitchell |
Thomas Q Langstaff |
W. Louis Sands |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; granting 40 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; adopting 47 Report and Recommendations.; adopting in part 61 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by U.S. District Judge W LOUIS SANDS on 9/3/14 (wks) |
Filing 27 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Leave to Appeal.Ordered by U.S. District Judge W. Louis Sands on 11/26/13 (wks) |
Filing 19 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e). Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 8/29/13 (wks) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 8 Motion for TRO; adopting in part and reversing in part Report and Recommendations re 10 Report and Recommendations. The Court does not adopt and reverses the portion of the Order transferring certain claims to the Southern District of Georgia and Remands for further proceedings in accordance with this Order.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 4/10/13 (wks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.