RUTHERFORD v. INTERIM FUNDING CORPORATION
Plaintiff: HOKE RUTHERFORD, JR
Defendant: INTERIM FUNDING CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2013cv00200
Filed: December 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Albany Office
County: Ben Hill
Presiding Judge: W LOUIS SANDS
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion for Default Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge W LOUIS SANDS on 8/8/2014. (bcl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RUTHERFORD v. INTERIM FUNDING CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERIM FUNDING CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HOKE RUTHERFORD, JR
Represented By: JERRY A LUMLEY
Represented By: John C. Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?