SHAW v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: LISA LEE SHAW
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Case Number: 3:2017cv00064
Filed: April 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Athens Office
County: Walton
Presiding Judge: STEPHEN HYLES
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 9-26-18 (jdl)
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 3-26-18. (bdd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAW v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LISA LEE SHAW
Represented By: HOWARD D OLINSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?