Davis v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Michelle Marie Davis |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
3:2020cv00141 |
December 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
STEPHEN HYLES |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return EXECUTED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (ggs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/25/2021: #1 USM 285 Office of the Regional Chief Counsel) (ggs). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/9/2021: #2 USM 285 U.S. Attorney General) (ggs). |
Filing 8 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY (Civil Process Clerk), U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL. (ggs) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. All parties having consented pursuant to 28 USC 636(c)(1) for a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in connection with this action, including but not limited to, the trial of said case and the ordering of the entry of judgment herein; this case is hereby reassigned to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES for all further proceedings. (ggs) |
Filing 7 Consent to proceed before a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in 28 U.S.C 636(c)(1) and (2) (COMERFORD, IDA) |
Filing 6 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY (CIVIL PROCESS CLERK), U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL. (ggs) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney (Civil Process Clerk) and U.S. Attorney General (ggs) |
Filing 4 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing service by USMS. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 12-21-20. (jdl) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHELLE MARIE DAVIS filed by KENNETH R HILLER.. Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(HILLER, KENNETH) |
Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to MICHELLE MARIE DAVIS. (ggs) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint (IFP), filed by Michelle Marie Davis ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. ADDITIONALLY, Pursuant to page 13 of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures manual, generic descriptions for exhibits/attachments are not permitted (i.e. Exhibit A, etc.) NO NEED TO REFILE, corrections made by case manager.(ggs) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint (IFP), filed by Michelle Marie Davis ); Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis must be filed as a separate filing and not as an attachment to the complaint. Document must be refiled using the correct event "Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis." (ggs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed by Michelle Marie Davis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Decision - Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Motion to Proceed in Forma Paupres)(COMERFORD, IDA) Modified on 12/21/2020 (ggs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.