WILSON v. COILE et al
| TAWANNA S WILSON |
| JUDGE MEGAN COILE, KELLI PARADISE SMITH and ALISON HAYNES |
| 3:2022cv00066 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| C ASHLEY ROYAL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM by TAWANNA S WILSON. re #5 Notice of Appeal NO TRANSCRIPTS ORDERED (ggs) |
| Filing 7 USCA Case Number 22-12394-HH re #5 Notice of Appeal filed by TAWANNA S WILSON. (ggs) |
| Filing 6 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #4 Judgment, #3 Order, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #5 Notice of Appeal Judge Appealed: C. Ashley Royal. Court Reporter: N/A. Fee: IFP. (ggs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Judgment by TAWANNA S WILSON. (ggs) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT (ggs) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing #1 Complaint filed by TAWANNA S WILSON. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 6/27/2022. (ggs)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by TAWANNA S WILSON.(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MEGAN COILE, ALISON HAYNES, KELLI PARADISE SMITH, filed by TAWANNA S WILSON. (ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
