FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. LUNSFORD

Defendant: PAULA LUNSFORD
Plaintiff: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Case Number: 4:2013cv00005
Filed: January 4, 2013
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Columbus Office
County: Muscogee
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 15, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 7 Motion for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Remand; vacating Text Order dated February 1, 2013 on Motion to Remand; denying 4 MOTION to Remand; setting date for trial on the merits. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 02/15/2013. (CGC) ***

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. LUNSFORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAULA LUNSFORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Represented By: DANIEL K BARBAGELATA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.