SALAS v. POLAK et al
| ZACHARY KALEOKALANI SALAS |
| AARON POLAK, LYFT INC and UBER USA LLC |
| 4:2019cv00198 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. This consent motion is granted. Defendant has until February 10, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 1/16/2020 (mdb) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE Plaintiff's Consent to Amended Motion of Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by LYFT INC re #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (SCHNELL, GRANT) |
Filing 19
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Answer deadline set for 2/27/2020. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 1/15/2020 (tlp)
|
| Filing 18 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by UBER USA LLC filed by COLIN KAMRATH KELLY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email confirming consent of pro se Plaintiff)(KELLY, COLIN) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE Lyft, Inc.'s Certificate of Service of Amended Motion for Extenstion of Time to Respond to Complaint by LYFT INC re #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (SCHNELL, GRANT) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by LYFT INC filed by CYNTHIA G BURNSIDE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(BURNSIDE, CYNTHIA) |
| Filing 15 Replaced by D.E. #16 . MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by LYFT INC filed by CYNTHIA G BURNSIDE.(BURNSIDE, CYNTHIA) Modified on 1/10/2020 (tlf). |
| Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by LYFT, INC.; Plaintiff is not a registered CM/ECF user and thus must be served by conventional means outside of CM/ECF, as he does not get served via CM/ECF. A certificate of Service for document indicating plaintiff was served outside of CM/ECF not attached. Additionally, the proposed Order contains a signature block for a judge not assigned to this case or even within the district. To remedy the service issue, please serve plaintiff by conventional means and then file a certificate of service using the event Civil Events, Initial Pleadings and Service, Service of Process, Certificate of Service. To remedy the proposed Order issue, please send a proposed Order in Word processing format to columbus.ecf@gamd.uscourts.gov (tlf). |
| Plaintiffs Requests for CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to is DECLINED - Time for responsive pleading or dispositive motion has not lapsed. (tlp) |
| Filing 14 Application to Clerk for Entry of Default against LYFT INC (tlp) |
| Filing 13 Application to Clerk for Entry of Default against UBER USA LLC (tlp) |
| Filing 12 Application to Clerk for Entry of Default against AARON POLAK (tlp) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to AARON POLAK (tlp) |
| Filing 10 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return EXECUTED for AARON POLAK (tlp) |
| Filing 9 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for LYFT INC, AARON POLAK, UBER USA LLC (tlp) |
| Filing 8 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for LYFT INC, AARON POLAK, UBER USA LLC (tlp) |
| Filing 7 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying #6 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. Plaintiff misunderstands the public nature of federal courts. Except for extraordinary circumstances, filings in federal court are accessible to the public. Speculation that future filings may include proprietary confidential information does not authorize the sealing of an entire complaint or civil action. As the Court noted in its previous order, there is nothing in Plaintiff's complaint that is proprietary or confidential such that the Complaint should be filed under seal. If during the pendency of this action, Plaintiff believes certain matters are protected due to proprietary confidential reasons, Plaintiff may file a motion related to the specific document informing the Court why the particular document should be filed with restricted access. Plaintiff's motion, however as it currently stands, is denied--again. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on December 4, 2019 (CDL) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint under Seal - filed by ZACHARY KALEOKALANI SALAS.(tlp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/3/2019: #1 Proposed Order) (tlp). |
| Filing 5 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing service by USMS. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 12-3-19. (jdl) |
| Filing 4 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying #3 Motion to Seal Document. Out of an abundance of caution and at Plaintiff's request, the Clerk's Office temporarily administratively sealed this file so that no documents would be accessible on the public docket. Having reviewed Plaintiff's complaint and request to seal, the Court finds that neither this action nor Plaintiff's complaint should be sealed. The Clerk is directed to unseal this case such that it shall be treated like any other action with unrestricted public access. If Plaintiff or the other parties determine that certain specific proprietary information should be restricted, they may file a motion to have access to those specific documents restricted. The Magistrate Judge shall decide Plaintiff's pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, after which the case shall be handled by the undersigned. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on December 3, 2019 (CDL) |
| CASE SEALED (tlp) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES for review of pending motions.. Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(tlp) |
| US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES no longer assigned to case. (tlp) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Seal Document(s) #1 Complaint - filed by ZACHARY KALEOKALANI SALAS.(tlp) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by ZACHARY KALEOKALANI SALAS.(tlp) Modified on 12/3/2019 (tlp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LYFT INC, AARON POLAK, UBER USA LLC - filed by ZACHARY KALEOKALANI SALAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tlp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
