RILEY v. BARR
| FONTAINE LAVOT RILEY |
| WILLIAM BARR |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 4:2020cv00233 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER notifying Petitioner of #9 MOTION to Dismiss. ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 10-22-20. (rcg)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release from Detention by WILLIAM BARR filed by AMELIA G HELMICK.. Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(HELMICK, AMELIA) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by FONTAINE LAVOT RILEY (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion referred to US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES (tlf). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 10-20-20. (rcg)
|
| Habeas filing fee of $5.00 paid in the Central District of California on 10/15/2020 (tlf). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in District Transfer from District of California Central; Case Number 2:20-cv-08769. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.** |
| Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by FONTAINE LAVOT RILEY; You must either pay the filing fee or submit a properly completed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 21 days from the date of this notice. Failure to comply with this notice may result in dismissal by the court. An Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit are enclosed(tlf). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING HABEAS CORPUS ACTION by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Columbus Division. (see document for further details). Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (hr) [Transferred from cacd on 9/30/2020.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 9/30/2020.] |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Inmate Filing filed by Petitioner Fontaine Lavot Riley. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 9/30/2020.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241). Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth.(Filing fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Fontaine Lavot Riley. (lh) [Transferred from cacd on 9/30/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
