PREVOST-SOYET v. BARR et al
| PREVOST SOYET-YUNIER, PREVOST SOYET YUNIER, YUNIER PREVOST-SOYET and YUNIER PREVOST SOYET |
| Warden MICHAEL J DONAHUE, CHAD WOLL and WILLIAM BARR |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 4:2020cv00264 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned - #3 Order returned as undeliverable. (tlp) |
Filing 3
ORDER directing Petitioner to sign and return the Petition within twenty-one (21) days. The Clerk is directed to send Petitioner a copy of his Petition so he can sign it under penalty of perjury and return to the Court. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 11-30-20. (jdl)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 10/27/2020. (esl)
|
| Notice of Deficiency (related document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by YUNIER PREVOST-SOYET); PETITION NOT SIGNED. Petition must be signed and returned.(esl) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ($5 Filing fee PAID - Manual Receipt number 42601.),filed by PREVOST SOYET-YUNIER. (Attachments: #1 Account Certification, #2 Inmate Account Summary, #3 Envelope)(esl) Modified on 10/27/2020 (esl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
