DANIEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: RODERICK DANIEL, SR
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Case Number: 4:2021cv00209
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: STEPHEN HYLES
Referring Judge: CLAY D LAND
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 01/13/2021. (msg)
December 22, 2021 Filing 8 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying #7 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 12/22/2021. (msg)
December 21, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by RODERICK DANIEL SR. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint and Bankruptcy Documents) (tlf).
December 10, 2021 Filing 6 Consent to proceed before a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in 28 U.S.C 636(c)(1) and (2) (tlf).
December 10, 2021 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. All parties having consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1) for a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in connection with this action, including but not limited to, the trial of said case and the ordering of the entry of judgment herein; this case is hereby reassigned to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES for all further proceedings (tlf).
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay filing fee within fourteen (14) days. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 12/06/2021. (msg)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to RODERICK DANIEL, SR (esl)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RODERICK DANIEL, SR.. Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(esl)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (esl)
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,filed by RODERICK DANIEL, SR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits - SSA and medical documents)(esl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DANIEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODERICK DANIEL, SR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?