3 C Cattle Co. v. Kelley
| 3 C Cattle Co. |
| Walter Kelley |
| 5:2008cv00115 |
| April 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office |
| Jasper |
| Hugh Lawson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 7/2/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER affirming judgment of the bankruptcy court. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/27/2009. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: 3 C Cattle Co. v. Kelley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: 3 C Cattle Co. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Walter Kelley | |
| Represented By: | Walter W. Kelley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
