HARDEN v. DOES
GEORGE E HARDEN |
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES |
5:2012cv00255 |
July 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Baldwin |
Stephen Hyles |
Marc Thomas Treadwell |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Case dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 8/3/2012. (tlh) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, Order to Recast Complaint. Plaintiff shall recast complaint as required in the Order within twenty-one (21) days. Ordered by US Mag Judge Stephen Hyles on 7/9/12. (AGH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HARDEN v. DOES | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JOHN AND OR JANE DOES | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GEORGE E HARDEN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.