THOMAS v. HUMPHREY et al
LAMARCUS THOMAS |
MEDICAL CARE PROVIDERS, JOHN DOE, CARL HUMPHREY, YOUNG, EDWARD HALE BURNSIDE, MERRY GORE, PETERSON and HILL |
5:2013cv00108 |
March 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Butts |
Marc Thomas Treadwell |
Charles H Weigle |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER ADOPTING 97 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 90 Motion for Summary Judgment; and DENYING 95 Motion for Order to Show Cause (construed as a motion to appoint counsel). Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/23/2015. (tlh) |
Filing 79 ORDER ADOPTING 73 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 67 Motion for TRO and DENYING 67 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/28/2014. (tlh) |
Filing 66 ORDER ADOPTING 64 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 43 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Humphrey and the Plaintiff's claims for damages against the Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED. The Plaintiff's denial-of-medical-care claims against Defendants Burnside and Gore shall be allowed to go forward. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/19/2014. (tlh) |
Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 6/27/2013. (tlh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.