UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TREVITT et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 15, 2016
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 83 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter JUDGMENT in favor of the Government for: a. $18,472.00, plus fees, interest, and statutory additions provided by law against the Trevitts for the 2003 assessment; and b. $417,582.28, plus fees, interest, and statutory additions provided by law against Carmen Trevitt for the 2002, 2004, and 2005 assessment, and the 2005 and 2011 tax penalties. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 7/15/2016. (tlh)
|August 28, 2014
ORDER granting 41 Motion to Set Aside Default; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Strike; denying 48 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 49 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 61 Motion to Amend; denying 65 Motion for Hearing; denying 66 Motion for Hearing. The Trevitts must file their amended answer or other responsive pleading to the Governments Amended Complaint and BB&Ts Crossclaim within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order. The parties are DIRECTED to resubmit an amended proposed scheduling and discovery order within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the Trevitts' amended answer. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C ASHLEY ROYAL on 8/28/14 (lap)
|February 11, 2014
ORDER denying 27 Motion to Strike ; denying 29 Motion to Strike ; denying 30 Motion for Hearing; granting 13 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims; denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C ASHLEY ROYAL on 2/11/14 (lap)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?