COBBLE v. ROYAL et al
| DANIEL ERIC COBBLE |
| SHEILA OUBRE, C ASHLEY ROYAL and PATRICK HEAD |
| 5:2013cv00277 |
| August 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Baldwin |
| Stephen Hyles |
| Marc Thomas Treadwell |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER clarifying 22 Order per 25 USCA Order. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/6/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING 15 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with his appeal, he must pay the entire $ 455.00 appellate filing fee. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the custodi an of the prison in which Petitioner is presently incarcerated. Any further requests to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be directed, on motion, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 10/1/2013. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 Petition; DISMISSING 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DISMISSING 4 Motion to Accept that Petitioner is not Challenging Convictions; and DISMISSING 6 Motion for Court to Issue Same Motions as in 5:12-cv-253. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 8/12/2013. (tlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
