CERTUSBANK NA v. THAXTON NOTE ACQUISITION LLC et al
Plaintiff: CERTUSBANK NA
Defendant: THAXTON NOTE ACQUISITION LLC, CCS DEVELOPMENT INC, GILLIARD TRUCKING INC and KENNETH SAMS THAXTON
Case Number: 5:2015cv00143
Filed: April 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Crawford
Presiding Judge: C ASHLEY ROYAL
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to submit a proposed judgment within seven (7) days of the date of this Order addressing the amount due on the Note and the amount of attorneys fees due. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 2/23/17 (lap)
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 26 Motion to Substitute Party. RREF II CER CO Acquisitions, LLC is SUBSTITUTED as the Plaintiff in this action and shall be listed as the Plaintiff on all subsequent pleadings and filings in t his matter. Laurel Creek Spainhour and William K. Carmichael and the law firm Stokes Carmichael & Ernst LLP shall remain as counsel of record for Plaintiff RREF in this matter. It is further ORDERED that CertusBank is hereby RELEASED from this action without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 6/1/2016. (tlh)
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DENYING without prejudice 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties are hereby DIRECTED to submit a revised Scheduling and Discovery Order within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 1/29/2016. (tlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CERTUSBANK NA v. THAXTON NOTE ACQUISITION LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CERTUSBANK NA
Represented By: WILLIAM K CARMICHAEL
Represented By: LAUREL SPAINHOUR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THAXTON NOTE ACQUISITION LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CCS DEVELOPMENT INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GILLIARD TRUCKING INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KENNETH SAMS THAXTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?