EDWARDS v. BROWN et al
| TREVONTE EDWARDS |
| CAMERON BROWN and BOWMAN |
| 5:2015cv00191 |
| May 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Hancock |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING as modified 19 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 15 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/9/2016. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER: The Defendants are ORDERED to address no later than February 11, 2016, (1) the Plaintiffs allegation that he did not submit an appeal because he was transferred and prison officials refused to forward the appeal form and (2) the issue of whether the Court can consider events occurring subsequent to the filing of the complaint in determining whether a prisoner has exhausted available administrative remedies. The Plaintiff shall have until March 3, 2016, to respond to the Defendants. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/22/2016. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TREVONTE EDWARDS, denying 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by TREVONTE EDWARDS. ORDER Directing Service re 1 Complaint filed by TREVONTE EDWARDS. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 6-3-15. (mpm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
