BLASH v. CITY OF HAWKINSVILLE AND PULASKI COUNTY GEORGIA SHERRIF'S OFFICE et al
JOHNNY BLASH |
CITY OF HAWKINSVILLE AND PULASKI COUNTY GEORGIA SHERRIF'S OFFICE, HAWKINSVILLE-PULASKI COUNTY, GEORGIA, BILLY W CAPE and DANNY BRANNEN |
5:2017cv00380 |
October 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Bleckley |
LESLIE J ABRAMS |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 73 Motion for Leave to File. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E. SELF, III on 12/30/2019. (ech) |
Filing 88 ORDER. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E. SELF, III on 8/7/2019. (ech) |
Filing 48 ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 8/29/2018. (chc) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim except Count 1 and 3 asserted against Brannen in his official capacity; Order granting 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim except Count 3; Order granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and Order granting 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 6/27/2018. (chc) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Take Judicial Notice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 5/16/2018. (chc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.