CROSBY v. BROCK AND SCOTT PLLC

Plaintiff: TIMOTHY CROSBY
Defendant: BROCK AND SCOTT PLLC
Case Number: 5:2017cv00445
Filed: November 11, 2017
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Macon Office
County: Bibb
Presiding Judge: C ASHLEY ROYAL
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 1, 2018 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Courts Stay of Discovery is hereby LIFTED. The Parties are DIRECTED to submit a proposed scheduling order pursuant to the Courts Rules 16/26 Order [Doc. 8]. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 5/1/2018 (chc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CROSBY v. BROCK AND SCOTT PLLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY CROSBY
Represented By: CLIFFORD ALVA PHILLIP CARLSON
Represented By: RONALD E DANIELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BROCK AND SCOTT PLLC
Represented By: KYLE SHIGEYUKI KOTAKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?