EVERIDGE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINSTRATION
| AMBER EVERIDGE |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINSTRATION |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
| 5:2018cv00011 |
| January 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Bibb |
| LESLIE J ABRAMS |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to AMBER EVERIDGE. (mdm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AMBER EVERIDGE filed by SARAH ELIZABETH WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Summons USA MD Ga, #2 Summons Commissioner SSA, #3 Summons USAG, #4 USM 285 USA MD Ga, #5 USM 285 Commissioner SSA, #6 USM 285 USAG). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(WHITE, SARAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINSTRATION filed by AMBER EVERIDGE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Extension Request and Confirmation AC Main, #2 Exhibit B - Extension Request and confirmation AC Branches, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(WHITE, SARAH) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by AMBER EVERIDGE); Other - Summonses should have been attached to the #1 Complaint - NO NEED TO REFILE. (mdm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
