HIGHTOWER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Plaintiff: JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III
Defendant: CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION, SPECIAL AGENT DONALD JONES, OFFICER THOMAS and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 5:2018cv00322
Filed: September 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Referring Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Filing 7 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for THOMAS (vs)
October 25, 2018 Filing 6 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for Officer THOMAS. (vs) (vs).
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III. It is also Ordered that Service be made on DEFENDANT OFFICER THOMAS. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that claimsagainst the Georgia Department of Corrections, the Criminal Investigations Division, and Special Agent Donald Jones be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE re #1 Complaint filed by JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III () Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 10/25/2018. (vs)
September 5, 2018 Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III (vs)
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (vs)
September 4, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III.. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(vs)
September 4, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD JONES, THOMAS,filed by JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(vs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HIGHTOWER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SPECIAL AGENT DONALD JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPH HIGHTOWER, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?