PETERSON v. BARNARD et al
JOE W PETERSON |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and GLORIA HAWKINS-TURNAGE |
5:2019cv00373 |
September 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Filed by JOE W PETERSON. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ans) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JOE W PETERSON () Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 10/28/19. (ans) |
Filing 4 Letter from JOE PETERSON regarding case inquiry - copy of docket sheet mailed to petitioner (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (ans) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JOE W PETERSON. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ans) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,filed by JOE W PETERSON. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.