PATEL et al v. MAYORKAS et al
| DINNALKUMAR KIRTIBHAI PATEL and AMITABAHEN DINNALKUMAR PATEL |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL RENAUD, MERRICK GARLAND and TRACY RENAUD |
| 5:2023cv00365 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| MARC T TREADWELL |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Merrick Garland, #2 Summons Tracy Renaud, #3 Summons Daniel Renaud, #4 Summons US Attorney MDGA)(sst) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4466101, $402 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #3 Summons Summon for Daniel M. Renaud, #4 Summons Summons for Merrick Garland, #5 Summons Summons for Tracy Renaud, #6 Summons Summons for U.S. Attorney MDGA, #7 Exhibit I-918 Receipt Notice, #8 Exhibit I-918A Receipt Notice, #9 Exhibit USCIS POLICY MANUAL, #10 Exhibit I-765 Receipt Notice, #11 Exhibit I-765 Receipt Notice, #12 Exhibit I-918 Biometrics Notice, #13 Exhibit I-918 A Biometrics Notice)(CHAUDHARY, BHAVYA) |
| US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES no longer assigned to case. (sst) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
