STINSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
SHATERICA STINSON |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
5:2024cv00271 |
August 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
MARC T TREADWELL |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER and TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Hearing re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Decisions, #6 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Disability Related Development, #8 Medical Records Part 1, #9 Medical Records Part 2, #10 Medical Records Part 3)(BLAKE, RICHARD) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by RICHARD V BLAKE on behalf of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Attorney RICHARD V BLAKE added to party COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY(pty:dft)(BLAKE, RICHARD) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) (rka) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rka) Modified to remove text only order information on 8/7/2024 (rka). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4719296, $405 filed by SHATERICA STINSON (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PIEMONTE, GEORGE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.