Colvin v. Brown
Petitioner: Richard C Colvin
Respondent: Dennis Brown
Case Number: 7:2009cv00037
Filed: March 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Habeas Corpus: General Office
County: Thomas
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Hodge
Presiding Judge: W. Louis Sands
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER finding as moot 43 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/17/2012. (nbp)
January 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 35 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 1/04/2012. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colvin v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard C Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dennis Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?