Malcolm v. John Does 1-5
Plaintiff: Patrick A Malcolm
Defendant: John Does 1-5
Case Number: 7:2011cv00026
Filed: February 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: Tift
Presiding Judge: Hugh Lawson
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/16/2011. (nbp)
February 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Discovery; directing amended complaint be filed by 4/29/2011. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/28/2011. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malcolm v. John Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick A Malcolm
Represented By: Kelly O Wallace
Represented By: Jamie Ponder Woodard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?