MONK v. FLOYD et al
Plaintiff: JASON CHARLES MONK
Defendant: FLOYD
Case Number: 7:2013cv00114
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: Irwin
Presiding Judge: Thomas Q Langstaff
Presiding Judge: Hugh Lawson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER finding as moot 17 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting 21 Report and Recommendations;dismissing case for failure to properly prosecute. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 6/27/2014. (nbp)
September 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 9/10/2013. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONK v. FLOYD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLOYD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JASON CHARLES MONK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?