MCCALL-JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURIITY
LISA MCCALL-JOHNSON |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURIITY and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
7:2021cv00026 |
March 8, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
W LOUIS SANDS |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURIITY (rlw) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURIITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (rlw) |
Filing 6 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for CIVIL PROCESS CLERK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, and OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL. (rlw) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to LISA MCCALL-JOHNSON (rlw) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LISA MCCALL-JOHNSON filed by GEORGE C PIEMONTE. (Attachments: #1 Pauper Proposed Order). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(PIEMONTE, GEORGE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURIITY filed by LISA MCCALL-JOHNSON (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Attorney, #3 Summons Office Regional Chief Counsel, #4 Summons Attorney General)(PIEMONTE, GEORGE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.