WILLIAMS v. TOBY
| SALEEM D WILLIAMS |
| ANNETTE TOBY |
| 7:2021cv00044 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by PAULA K SMITH on behalf of ANNETTE TOBY Attorney PAULA K SMITH added to party ANNETTE TOBY(pty:res)(SMITH, PAULA) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by MATTHEW BLACKWELL CROWDER on behalf of ANNETTE TOBY Attorney MATTHEW BLACKWELL CROWDER added to party ANNETTE TOBY(pty:res)(CROWDER, MATTHEW) |
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING Petitioner to amend his petition within 30 days and ORDERING Respondent to file an answer within 60 days. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 6/7/2021. (asb)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff regarding avoiding his relief being exhausted. (Attachments: #1 Supreme Court Order, #2 Envelope)(sbd) |
| Filing fee Paid: Habeas $5.00, Receipt No. 42684. (sbd) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner is Ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $5.00. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 5/3/2021 (TQL)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing the signed PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by SALEEM D WILLIAMS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rlw)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by SALEEM D WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Letter to Mrs. Wells from Saleem D. Williams, #3 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by SALEEM D WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Supreme Court and Superior Court documents, # (2***disregard wrong envelope*** Envelope)(rlw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2021: #3 Correct Envelope) (rlw). Modified text on 4/19/2021 (rlw). |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by SALEEM D WILLIAMS ); Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, every pleading, written motion and other papers must be signed by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. You must refile your signed document within 21 days from the date of this notice. Failure to comply with this notice may result in dismissal of your case by the Court.(rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. TOBY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ANNETTE TOBY | |
| Represented By: | PAULA K SMITH |
| Represented By: | MATTHEW BLACKWELL CROWDER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SALEEM D WILLIAMS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
