JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| KHARITEE JOHNSON |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 7:2022cv00022 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Local Rule 9.2 Social Security Identification Form by KHARITEE JOHNSON (PIEMONTE, GEORGE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4035419, $402 filed by KHARITEE JOHNSON (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Attorney, #3 Summons Office Regional Chief Counsel, #4 Summons Attorney General)(PIEMONTE, GEORGE) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #2 Local Rule 9.2 Social Security Identification Form filed by KHARITEE JOHNSON ); The signature block does not include the address, telephone number and e-mail address of the filer. Please do not re-file, for future reference only. See Fed.R.Civ.P 11.(ggs) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by KHARITEE JOHNSON ); It is no longer necessary to include summonses for Social Security Appeal cases in the Middle District of Georgia. NO ACTION NEEDED - FOR FUTURE REFERENCE ONLY Please see MDGA Local Rule 9.2.(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
