Cobble v. Cobb County Police, et al
| Daniel Eric Cobble |
| Cobb County Police Department, R. W. Lee, James W. Tannahill, David Charles Mulkey, Jerome Francis Peitzman, Stanley B. Wheeler, Hugh Robinson and Joan Bloom |
| 1:2002cv02821 |
| October 15, 2002 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Cobb |
| Richard W. Story |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 34 Application to Appeal in forma pauperis. The Court hereby CERTIFIES that this appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 5/29/2014. (cem)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER: Plaintiff's construed Motion for Reconsideration 5 and construed Motion to Recuse Federal Judge Richard W. Story for His Failure to Answer a Single Legal Argument 21 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 12/3/2013. (cem)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 7 Request to Appeal in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Produce Documents is DENIED, Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Court to Order U.S. Marshals to Serve All Many Different Defendants is DENIED AS MOOT, Plaintiff's 10 Extraordinary Motion for New Civil Trial is DENIED, and Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Reverse Dismissal is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/1/2013. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
