Parker, et al v. Brush Wellman Inc., et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Northern District Parker, et al v. Brush Wellman Inc., et al

Parker, et al v. Brush Wellman Inc., et al

Case Number:	1:2004cv00606
Filed:	March 4, 2004
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge:	Richard W. Story
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 17, 2010	Filing 419 ORDER denying as moot plaintiffs' 314 Amended MOTION to Compel (Enforce Subpoena and Agreement and Compel Production of Documents); denying as moot plaintiffs' 319 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting 345 Motion for Summ ary Judgment by Thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc.; granting 346 Motion for Summary Judgment by Alcoa Inc, McCann Aerospace Machining Corporation, Schmiede Machine and Tool Corporation, Thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc.; granting 347 Motion for Summar y Judgment by Alcoa Inc.; granting 352 Motion to Exclude Testimony From Dr. John W. Martyny by Alcoa, Inc.; granting 356 Motion for Summary Judgment by McCann Aerospace Machining Corporation; granting 358 Motion in Limine Daubert Motion to Excl ude the Expert Testimony of John W. Martyny by McCann Aerospace Machining Corporation; and granting 360 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to the Component Manufacturer Doctrine by Schmiede Machine and Tool Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/17/2010. (pdw)
August 25, 2010	Filing 414 ORDER: All motions to file excess pages are GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 357 , 401 , 403 , 409 . Motions for joinder are also GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 348 , 361 , 362 , 400 , 406 . Plaintiffs have voluntarily withdrawn their claims for strict liabil ity and attorneys' fees. Such claims are hereby DISMISSED. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED, in part 345 , 346 , 347 , 356 , 360 . The Court RESERVES RULING on the proximate cause and exposure issues until it conduc ts a hearing. At this time, the Court RESERVES RULING on Defendant Alcoa's Motion to Exclude Testimony 352 and Defendant McCann's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of John W. Martyny 358 . Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 310 is DENIED as moot. The Court will RESERVE RULING on Plaintiffs Amended Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Lockheed Martin 314 and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents by McCann 319 until the hearing. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Answers to Deposition Questions by Schmiede 323 and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Notice of Non-Parties to Whom fault Should be Allocated 330 are DENIED. The parties shall appear for a hearing on Thursday, September 2, 2010 at 2:00 P.M., Courtroom 2105, United States Courthouse, Atlanta, Georgia for a Daubert hearing as well as oral arguments on all motions for which the Court has reserved ruling.. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/25/2010. (pdw)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 17, 2010

Filing 419 ORDER denying as moot plaintiffs' 314 Amended MOTION to Compel (Enforce Subpoena and Agreement and Compel Production of Documents); denying as moot plaintiffs' 319 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting 345 Motion for Summ ary Judgment by Thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc.; granting 346 Motion for Summary Judgment by Alcoa Inc, McCann Aerospace Machining Corporation, Schmiede Machine and Tool Corporation, Thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc.; granting 347 Motion for Summar y Judgment by Alcoa Inc.; granting 352 Motion to Exclude Testimony From Dr. John W. Martyny by Alcoa, Inc.; granting 356 Motion for Summary Judgment by McCann Aerospace Machining Corporation; granting 358 Motion in Limine Daubert Motion to Excl ude the Expert Testimony of John W. Martyny by McCann Aerospace Machining Corporation; and granting 360 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to the Component Manufacturer Doctrine by Schmiede Machine and Tool Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/17/2010. (pdw)

August 25, 2010

Filing 414 ORDER: All motions to file excess pages are GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 357 , 401 , 403 , 409 . Motions for joinder are also GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 348 , 361 , 362 , 400 , 406 . Plaintiffs have voluntarily withdrawn their claims for strict liabil ity and attorneys' fees. Such claims are hereby DISMISSED. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED, in part 345 , 346 , 347 , 356 , 360 . The Court RESERVES RULING on the proximate cause and exposure issues until it conduc ts a hearing. At this time, the Court RESERVES RULING on Defendant Alcoa's Motion to Exclude Testimony 352 and Defendant McCann's Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of John W. Martyny 358 . Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 310 is DENIED as moot. The Court will RESERVE RULING on Plaintiffs Amended Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Lockheed Martin 314 and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents by McCann 319 until the hearing. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Answers to Deposition Questions by Schmiede 323 and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Notice of Non-Parties to Whom fault Should be Allocated 330 are DENIED. The parties shall appear for a hearing on Thursday, September 2, 2010 at 2:00 P.M., Courtroom 2105, United States Courthouse, Atlanta, Georgia for a Daubert hearing as well as oral arguments on all motions for which the Court has reserved ruling.. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 8/25/2010. (pdw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker, et al v. Brush Wellman Inc., et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?