Botes v. Weintraub
Plaintiff: A. Stephan Botes
Defendant: Howard J. Weintraub
Case Number: 1:2008cv01341
Filed: April 4, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Moye
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER and OPINION granting 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting nunc pro tunc 86 Motion to Waive Page Limits, 96 Motion For Extension of Time, 91 Motion For Extension of Time, 95 Motion to Strike; denying 75 Motion For Discovery and Sanctions, 97 Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing this action. The Clerk is directed to remove the inadvertently docketed 99 Motion to Strike from the Court's submission list. Signed by Judge Charles A. Moye, Jr on 3/11/2010. (tcc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Botes v. Weintraub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard J. Weintraub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A. Stephan Botes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?