Gondolier Pizza International, Inc. v. CRT Too, LLC et al
Gondolier Pizza International, Inc. |
CRT Too, LLC, John Guarino, Rob A. Johnson and Christopher A. Smith |
1:2008cv01986 |
June 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Carnes |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER and OPINION granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss; denying 8 Motion to Transfer Case; denying 22 Motion to Strike Response in Opposition of Motion and Affidavit in Opposition of Motion. For the foregoing reasons, the Co urt concludes that defendants' Motion to Dismiss 8 should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and defendants' Alternative Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Tennessee 8 should be DENIED. As an additional alternative, the C ourt encourages the parties to explore settlement of this matter. Should the parties wish to negotiate or mediate their dispute, the Court will stay the date for filing a motion for summary judgment. The parties and counsel should confer. The Court s ets a status conference for THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2:00 p.m., at which time the Court and counsel will discuss the above options and set a scheduling order. Defendants' Joint Motion to Strike or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Case 22 should also be DENIED. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 09/29/09. (fap) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.