Botes v. Steel
Plaintiff: A. Stephan Botes
Defendant: Brian Steel
Case Number: 1:2008cv02854
Filed: March 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Moye
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity action

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 OPINION and ORDER. Steel's 35 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; Steel's 40 , 67 motions to supplement and Botes's 58 motions to supplement, 61 for extension of time, and 64 for leave to file excess pages 64 are GRANTED nunc pro tunc; Botes's 50 motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and Botes's 60 motion for directions to the Clerk of Court is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Charles A. Moye, Jr. on 3/17/10. (bse)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Botes v. Steel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A. Stephan Botes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Steel
Represented By: Emory Livingston Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?