Gaucher v. U.S. Bank et al

Plaintiff: David D. Gaucher
Defendant: U.S. Bank and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv00591
Filed: February 24, 2012
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28:1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaucher v. U.S. Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David D. Gaucher
Represented By: John A. Roberts
Represented By: John Taylor Hopkins, IV
Represented By: Larry Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank
Represented By: Kenneth Marc Barre, Jr.
Represented By: Douglas Lee Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth Marc Barre, Jr.
Represented By: Douglas Lee Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.