Arsenault v. Tyler Perry Studios
Plaintiff: Richard Arsenault
Defendant: Tyler Perry Studios
Case Number: 1:2013cv00496
Filed: February 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William S. Duffey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's 18 Second Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's 12 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 2/26/2014. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arsenault v. Tyler Perry Studios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyler Perry Studios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Arsenault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?