United States of America v. One Glock GMBH 27 .40 Caliber Pistol Bearing Serial Number PNT348 et al

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Glock GMBH 27 .40 Caliber Pistol Bearing Serial Number PNT348 and 8 Rounds of .40 Caliber Ammunition
Case Number: 1:2013cv00818
Filed: March 14, 2013
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Marvin H. Shoob
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One Glock GMBH 27 .40 Caliber Pistol Bearing Serial Number PNT348 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Dahil Dueno Goss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Glock GMBH 27 .40 Caliber Pistol Bearing Serial Number PNT348
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 8 Rounds of .40 Caliber Ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?