Annamalai v. Harman

Petitioner: Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent: Darrin J. Harmon
Case Number: 1:2017cv04837
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Thomas W. Thrash
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 22, 2018 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 10 / 17 Final Report and Recommendation and DENYING Petitioner's Motions ( 19 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 31 , 35 ). The appeal is frivolous. The Clerk is directed to file any papers received from the Petitioner. However, no papers are to be docketed as motions requiring action by the Court unless the Clerk receives my express consent. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 1/22/2018. (jkl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Annamalai v. Harman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Annamalai Annamalai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Darrin J. Harmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?