Doe v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Doe v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Plaintiff:	Jane Doe
Defendant:	Cisco Systems Inc.
Case Number:	1:2018cv01558
Filed:	April 11, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office:	Atlanta Office
County:	Fulton
Presiding Judge:	Clarence Cooper
Presiding Judge:	John K. Larkins
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2020	Filing 137 OPINION & ORDER: the Court OVERRULES Defendant's objection and ADOPTS the R&R as the decision of this Court. As set forth herein and in the R&R, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions 89 a nd GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 85 . The summary judgment motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim but is GRANTED as to her remaining claims. As for Plaintiff 's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions, Plaintiff's request that Defendant's answer be stricken or that adverse inferences be imposed is DENIED. However, the Court has given only limited consideration to the testimony of Webster and Barl ow concerning the elimination of Plaintiff's position as part of the 2016 Restructuring, and the parties will be allowed to present evidence and argument at trial regarding Defendant's failure to preserve the organizational design document s and budget and guidelines for the SPM Group during the 2016 Restructuring, and the jury will be instructed it may consider that evidence along with all of the other evidence in the case in making its decision. Signed by Judge Clarence Cooper on 11/30/20. (bjh)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2020

Filing 137 OPINION & ORDER: the Court OVERRULES Defendant's objection and ADOPTS the R&R as the decision of this Court. As set forth herein and in the R&R, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions 89 a nd GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 85 . The summary judgment motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim but is GRANTED as to her remaining claims. As for Plaintiff 's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions, Plaintiff's request that Defendant's answer be stricken or that adverse inferences be imposed is DENIED. However, the Court has given only limited consideration to the testimony of Webster and Barl ow concerning the elimination of Plaintiff's position as part of the 2016 Restructuring, and the parties will be allowed to present evidence and argument at trial regarding Defendant's failure to preserve the organizational design document s and budget and guidelines for the SPM Group during the 2016 Restructuring, and the jury will be instructed it may consider that evidence along with all of the other evidence in the case in making its decision. Signed by Judge Clarence Cooper on 11/30/20. (bjh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By:	Cary Ichter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc.
Represented By:	Julia Christine Glasgow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?