Turley et al v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Dana Turley and Lila Wolff |
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
1:2018cv03775 |
August 7, 2018 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
Cobb |
Timothy C Batten |
Janet F King |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerks Notation re #11 Certificate of Interested Persons. READ and APPROVED by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. (kt) |
Clerks Notation re #11 Certificate of Interested Persons: reviewed and approved by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. (se) |
![]() |
Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons by Dana Turley, Lila Wolff. (Casurella, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) by Dana Turley, Lila Wolff. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Casurella, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Mary) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Lupin Limited for Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc..(Smith, Mary) |
Clerks Notation re #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement : reviewed and approved by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. (se) |
Clerks Notation re #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement. READ and APPROVED by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. (kt) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Larry R. Seegull; granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kathleen Allie McGinley. Entered by CRD at the direction of Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 9/5/18. (se) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Kathleen Allie McGinley Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8099377). Attorney Kathleen Allie McGinley added appearing on behalf of Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (pmb) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #5 APPLICATION for Admission of Larry R Seegull Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8099356). Attorney Larry R. Seegull added appearing on behalf of Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (pmb) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Kathleen Allie McGinley Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8099377)by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Smith, Mary) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Larry R Seegull Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8099356)by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Smith, Mary) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Mary) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Lila Wolff, Dana Turley. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Casurella, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lila Wolff and Dana Turley. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8064649) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -1, #2 Exhibit -2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.